<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A True China Bear</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.rawgreed.com/a-true-china-bear/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.rawgreed.com/a-true-china-bear</link>
	<description>Online Investing &#124; Investing in Gold</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Apr 2010 16:04:37 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: alan jacquemotte</title>
		<link>http://www.rawgreed.com/a-true-china-bear/comment-page-1#comment-51974</link>
		<dc:creator>alan jacquemotte</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jul 2008 21:49:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rawgreed.com/?p=461#comment-51974</guid>
		<description>From the high of 1930 (about 244) to the low of 1960 (about 600)the Dow was not even a triple. If you picked the 1932 low (about 60) you could get almost ONE thousand percent, not &quot;thousandS&quot;. In those particular 30 years a lot of other things probably did a lot better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From the high of 1930 (about 244) to the low of 1960 (about 600)the Dow was not even a triple. If you picked the 1932 low (about 60) you could get almost ONE thousand percent, not &#8220;thousandS&#8221;. In those particular 30 years a lot of other things probably did a lot better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
